Books:

• Cutler, B. L. (2011). Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press.
• Cutler, B. L. (Ed.). (2009). Expert testimony on the psychology of eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press. [American Psychology-Law Society Series]
• Cutler, B. L. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of psychology and law (Volumes I and II). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cutler, B. L. (2002). Eyewitness testimony: Challenging your opponent’s witness. Notre Dame, IN: National Institute for Trial Advocacy Press. [Translated into Japanese, 2007]
• Cutler, B. L., & Kovera, M. B. (2010). Evaluating eyewitness identification. New York: Oxford University Press (Oxford Forensic Best Practices Series).
• Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: Eyewitnesses, psychology and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Journal Articles:

• Cutler, B. L. (2006). A sample of witness, crime, and perpetrator characteristics affecting eyewitness identification accuracy. Cordozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal, 4, 327-340.
• Cutler, B. L., Daugherty, B., Babu, S., Hodges, L., & Van Wallendael, L. R. (2009). Creating blind photoarrays using virtual human technology: A feasibility test. Police Quarterly, 12, 289-300.
• Cutler, B. L., & Kovera, M. B. (2011). Expert psychological testimony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 53-57.
• Daugherty, B., Babu, S., Van Wallendael, L. R., Cutler, B. L., & Hodges, L. (2008). A comparison of virtual human vs. human administration of police lineups. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(6), 65-75.
• Devenport, J. L., & Cutler, B. L. (2004). Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 569-576.
• Devenport, J. L., Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1998). Eyewitness identification evidence: Evaluating commonsense evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 3, 338 361.
• Devenport, J. L., Stinson, V., Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. A. (2002). How effective are the expert testimony and cross-examination safeguards? Jurors’ perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1042-1054.
• Leach A., Cutler, B. L., & Van Wallendael, L. R. (2009). Lineups and eyewitness identification. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 157-178.
• Pavia, M., Berman, G. L., Cutler, B. L., Platania, J., & Weipert, R. (2011). Influence of confidence inflation and explanations for changes in confidence on evaluations of eyewitness identification accuracy. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 266-276.
• .Phillips, M., McAuliff, B. D., Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Double-blind lineup administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 940-951.
• Smith, A. M., Cutler, B. L., & Findley, K. A. (2011). An investigation of top-down vs. bottom-up processing in post-appellate review of a criminal case. Albany Law Review, 74, 1365-1378.